NTUser
BANNED | Редактировать | Профиль | Сообщение | Цитировать | Сообщить модератору Буки в Грузию были поставлены из Украины при Ющенко, то есть это старые советские Буки, а не М1, как у Кипра и Финляндии, поставленные туда Россией (на Кипр через греческих военных - которые в НАТО кстати): http://gordonua.com/news/politics/saakashvili-ukraina-dala-gruzii-sistemu-buk-i-my-sbili-12-rossiyskih-bombardirovshchikov-144438.html Следствие JIT утверждает, что MH17 был сбит российским Буком М1. Почему лось брызжет кипятком от данной новости (мол "московиты" скоро будут платить и каяться), непонятно. http://www.pronews.gr/kypros/635570_apokalyptiria-stin-kypro-gia-mystiko-oplo-tis-ethnofroyras-ta-aa-buk-m1-2-vgikan-apo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkvfVkRyRkM Ложь Укрии: http://korrespondent.net/ukraine/3523477-poslednyi-buk-ukrayna-prodala-hruzyy-sovetnyk-poroshenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3MomxNHnUA&feature=youtu.be&t=4m48s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5UuIerb40E https://consortiumnews.com/2016/09/28/troubling-gaps-in-the-new-mh-17-report/ Цитата: The Ukrainian Buks The JIT video report on the MH-17 case, which was released on Wednesday, also didnt address questions about the location of several Ukrainian Buk missile batteries that Dutch (i.e. NATO) intelligence placed in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, the day that MH-17 was shot down. A finding from the Dutch intelligence service, MIVD, released last October, said the only high-powered anti-aircraft missile systems in eastern Ukraine at that time, capable of bringing down MH-17 at 33,000 feet and killing all 298 people onboard, belonged to the Ukrainian military, not the rebels. | http://english.ctivd.nl/documents/reports/2015/10/13/index Ложь США (Керри): https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/20/mh17-crash-kerry-evidence-pro-russia-separatists-responsibility Цитата: We know with confidence that the Ukrainians did not have such a system anywhere near the vicinity at that point of time. | Опять же: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3MomxNHnUA&feature=youtu.be&t=4m48s И: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGw4nLWr8kw https://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201709201814-kko0.htm Цитата: We also know to a certainty that social media immediately afterwards saw reports of separatists bragging about knocking down a plane and then the so-called defence minister of Donetsk, Igor Strelkov, posted a report bragging about the shoot-down of a transport plane. | http://www.mk.ru/incident/2014/07/18/soobshhenie-strelkova-o-sbitom-an26-upavshem-za-terrikony-okazalos-poddelkoy.html http://korrespondent.net/ukraine/3870574-hyrkyn-my-ne-sbyvaly-MH17-za-neymenyem-sredstv Еще подробные разборы украинской кампании дезинформации по наличию функционирующего Бука у ополченцев и вины России за сбитие самолетов-транспортников: http://www.stalkerzone.org/buk-disinformation-campaign-began-ukraine-already-mh-17-tragedy/ http://kremlintroll.nl/?p=1312 Удивительная осведомленность украинских чиновников об инциденте: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSAjogFTHto Почему Украина в любом случае (кто бы ни сбил MH17 на самом деле) несет ответственность за произошедшую трагедию: https://ria.ru/mh17/20170723/1498939063.html Ущербность расследования JIT: https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/mh17-and-the-jit-a-flawed-investigation,9555 Цитата: There are two further aspects that need to be mentioned, because they are never discussed in the western mainstream media and the JIT did not consider that they were important enough to include in their report. The first fact is the existence of the agreement of August 2014 between the four initial investigating nations that no findings of the investigation would be released unless all of the parties to the agreement consented. It beggars belief that one of the prime suspects for perpetrating this atrocity, Ukraine, should be given what is in effect a veto over any adverse findings. The existence of this agreement fatally compromises the integrity of the investigation. It is no more than a hollow sham. The second aspect is the old Latin maxim, cui bono — or, differently expressed, who benefited from this crime. Despite two years of relentless propaganda there has not been a single explanation of how Russia, or for that matter the separatists, could expect to benefit from shooting down a civilian airliner with significant loss of life. There has been no such explanation, because none exists. On the contrary, culpability for such an atrocity would do enormous harm to the perpetrator and Russia had absolutely no motive to bring such opprobrium upon itself. Ukraine, on the other hand, had every motive to do so, as well as the means and, as the Almez Antay evidence clearly demonstrates, the opportunity as well. | Кто на самом деле вместо Путина получил со всей очевидностью дивиденды от этой трагедии: http://oorlogisgeenoplossing.blogspot.nl/p/blog-page_58.html http://www.stalkerzone.org/mh17-searching-motive-diplomatic-key/ Не говоря уже о странностях по поводу судьбы диспетчера из Днепропетровска, что вел(а) самолет. Где его (ее) показания? Почему якобы все украинские радары (и военные, и гражданские) не функционировали в тот день, находясь на техобслуживании? | Всего записей: 23819 | Зарегистр. 07-08-2005 | Отправлено: 20:28 19-10-2017 | Исправлено: NTUser, 22:44 19-10-2017 |
|